You Think
You Know Westerns—
A Double
Western Review
by Mike
Baker
Stay
Away, Joe
by Dan Cushman
Popular Library, 1953
In Stay
Away, Joe (1953) by Dan Cushman, Louis Champlain and his family live on a
Cree reservation in Montana just after the Korean War. Louis has been given 19
heifers and one bull by the Federal government to help him and his family out
of poverty. News travels fast on the Rez about Louis’ newfound wealth and a big
whoop up, a large unruly three-day beer party, spontaneously commences with
Louis and all his friends and relations. Louis wakes up hungover on the third
day to discover they drunkenly slaughtered and ate his only bull. His son Big Joe, bronc riding
WWII and Korean War vet, comes back from the rodeo riding circuit and offers
to help his dad get a new bull which everyone tells Louis is a bad idea, as
Joe is a drunken, philandering, petty criminal, but Louis loves his boy, and
things go horribly and ridiculously wrong from there.
Stay Away, Joe
sequentially tells a series of stories about how Louis goes from having
nothing to being “rich” to having nothing again. Each step along the way
either Louis or his family, driven either by the “old ways” are too generous
or by trying to be like how they imagine “white folks” would act derail the
Federal program of which they are currently a part.
The book’s opening, and if
you’ve read my reviews you know how much a I love a strong opening, is
charming and hilariously funny. I can’t say more than that. You need to read
it. Beyond that, the book meanders. It reminds me of Max Evans’ Rounders
which seemingly goes nowhere except it does. It has what I call a “ta da”
moment that cinches together all the threads into something tangible you can
take away. Stay Away, Joe doesn’t do that. The book hangs.
Cushman’s characters are
fulsome and meticulously drawn deeply flawed human beings. They are not
Indian stereotypes but, because Cushman was a white guy, you might make that
claim. He doesn’t seem to me to be judging them but rather his critique might
be what happens when you impose values on someone who isn’t native to those
values or worse, you see someone else’s values as superior to your own and
you acquiesce.
Cruel
Angel Past Sundown
by Hailey Piper
Death Head’s Press, 2023
Meanwhile, Cruel Angel Past Sundown (2023) by Hailey
Piper is about ranch wife Annette Klein the day she’s visited by a naked
pregnant woman dragging a cavalry saber out of the desert. Annette and her
husband Frank bring the woman inside where upon the woman straddles Annette’s
husband in bed and eviscerates him with the saber as Annette, in a weird
bloody eyed stupor, watches unable to stop the deranged pregnant woman as the
woman eats her husband’s viscera.
Later that night, Annette
stabbed by the pregnant woman’s father who shows up looking for his daughter
who he believes is the reborn virgin Mary carrying the Christ child. Annette
gets away on her bull Big Pete who takes her into the town of Low’s Bend where
she and her friends fight off father and daughter who have come to Low’s
Bend, for different reasons, to pretty much murder everyone there. The book
evolves rapidly though from a straight-ahead splatter western with a goth
twist, something like a weird western but with a horror bent, into something
more metaphysical which I did not see coming, wasn’t prepared for and
struggled against until the end of the book.
Piper writes in a mix of the
mundane and the poetical and sometimes suffers for this because, imho,
her voice feels uneven. It would be hard to write a book that was solidly
poetical so that you have to find a balance drawing out certain lines. It
reads here like two separate narratives, almost.
There’s a particular moment,
somewhere in the middle, where the main character gets bogged down arguing
with a supernatural villain. It would be comical if it wasn’t meant to be
deadly serious. It’s where the book is heading. Like I said, somewhere metaphysical.
Also, the book deals with
LGBTQ+ issues which I imagine might turn some readers off, you know who you
are, even you guys should read this. I would, like Marcellus Wallace
suggested, fight through that shit because it pays off. You might not like it
but a few days later, as what I experienced sunk in, I got that I’d read
something maybe important and, at the very least, interesting enough to be
worth my time.
You might ask yourself why I’m
reviewing these two vastly dissimilar books simultaneously. It works like
this: I started both books believing they were westerns and, it turns out,
they are westerns in the same way Star Wars is a movie about trash compactors
and intergalactic cabarets. They both have cowboys and Indians and horses and
stuff but neither fits the bill for what most anyone would call a western.
This is not a bad thing.
The genre, which I love
dearly, needs to be stretched and changed if it is to survive. My generation,
as well as the generation before mine, won’t keep it alive. I believe that
traditional westerns will only live on if first younger readers see a way into
the stories and books and writers like Hailey Piper will bring in those
readers. I wonder if Dan Cushman’s book had a similar effect in 1953 when it
came out. I would like to imagine that it was the gateway drug from cultural
elitists who read it, felt intellectually vindicated and then, while buying
smokes at the corner store, saw a Louis L ’Amour book and thought, why not.
|