I generally don’t write much about nonfiction, but I recently
read a slim volume about Chuck Yeager’s experience breaking the sound barrier
in the Bell X-1 in 1947: Across the High
Frontier by William R. Lundgren. The version I have is a mass market
published by Bantam in the late-1980s. The title page is missing, which, when I
discovered it, really bothered me for a few reasons, but mainly because it made
it more difficult to determine when, exactly, it was published. Fortunately
there is the Internet. Its original publication date was November 2, 1955.
The missing title page is only one of the oddities of
the book. The book is a “would you look at how great this guy is (and how long
suffering his wife and family are)?” story that, while appealing in a Hollywood
manner, wears thin after the first several dozen pages. It is presented in
three distinct parts—1. Yeager’s selection as the X-1’s test pilot, 2. Yeager’s
World War 2 experience, and 3. Yeager’s experience flying the X-1 and
ultimately breaking the sound barrier. The oddity of the presentation is
twofold. The first is the use, in sections one and three, of a second person
perspective. It is presented as though the reader is Chuck Yeager—
“That’s
all you’d done since1943, dogfighting. You could take care of yourself in
almost anything that would fly. You could wax almost every one of the flight
test pilots with whom you worked. You had a rough idea of what you could do.”
The second person narrative was disruptive—I had to
reread a few passages to figure out exactly who “you” was—until I got comfortable
with it. And I really did get comfortable with it. Every time my eyes saw “you”
my brain read “Chuck”. The other oddity was the author’s use of dialogue, which
decreased its credibility rather than increase it. There were conversations
between Chuck Yeager and other pilots. Chuck Yeager and engineers. Chuck Yeager
and his wife. Chuck Yeager and nearly everyone. All conversations I can’t imagine
the author heard, which made me doubt, and doubt is the death of any literature—fiction
or nonfiction.
With that said, I actually enjoyed the book. I didn’t
know much about Chuck Yeager before I opened its pages, and the most
interesting section of the book was the second, which detailed Mr Yeager’s
World War 2 experiences. He was shot down over France in 1944. His P-51 was
shot down on March 4, and he escaped across the Spanish border March 28. The
detail is interesting—there is an enjoyable scene as he tries to communicate
with a local farmer on the first day, and it rapidly (too rapidly, really)
chronicles his journey, with significant French Partisan help, through France
across the Pyrenees Mountains into Spain.
The third section also had its moments. It includes
some interesting technical aspects of the X-1 in an understandable manner—it only
had something like three minutes of powered flight time. There is an exciting
scene where Mr Yeager is, for the first time, entering the X-1’s cockpit while
attached to the belly of its B-29 escort. The air lashing him as he descended
the ladder from the B-29. There is the flight the sound barrier is exceeded. Mr
Yeager broke a rib in a horse riding incident a few days prior and successfully
hid it from everyone so he could keep his seat in the cockpit.
Across the High Frontier is as flawed a nonfiction book I have read. Its second person narrative is disruptive, and just plain strange. Its inappropriate use of dialogue—dialogue its author never could have heard, and the participants never could have remembered in specific detail—decreased its believability. But. And there really is a “but” here. I enjoyed it. Is it historically accurate? Not sure, really, but I have a feeling at least some of the details are probably a little inaccurate—personal interactions, specific meals, etc. The timeline is very likely accurate since it matched the detail from several online sources, and its overall story is really interesting.
1 comment:
My father wrote this book when I was a kid. I remember him working on it -- he had hours and hours of wire spool and reel to reel tapes of him interviews with Chuck Yaeger. They actually got to be good friends during the course of my Dad's research for the book, so I would venture to say that what my father wrote is what Chuck Yaeger actually said, including the meals and conversations with his wife.
As for the second person voice used in the book, I asked my dad about that when I was writing a book report on it in high school, and he told me that was the way Mr. Yaeger talked, and that he (my father) was trying to capture as much of Yaeger's personality as he could.
Otherwise, nice review -- Trudy Lundgren
Post a Comment